Reductivism is the claim that descriptions of the mind should be done away with in favor of descriptions of the brain. The Multiple Realizability Argument rejects reductivism because the same mind-state can be realized by multiple physical states. This video explores exactly what that means and how philosophers argue for it.
NOTES
- Multiple Realizability Argument
- realizable- an abstract description is made true by more ordinary objects
- Reductivism (reductive physicalism): Psychological categories can and should be replaced by physical categories
- So, there is a one-to-one correspondence between psychological categories and physical categories
- MRT: A mental state can be "realized by" or made true by more than one physical state
- So, there isn't a one-to-one correspondence
- So, reductivism is false
-
- Identity Theory entails reductivism, so it's false
- Arguing about MRT
- A1: biology
- Psychological states--minds--are an adaptive advantage
- It is likely aliens evolved on other planets
- So, it’s likely aliens have minds
- If aliens exist, then it's likely they evolved using different stuff
- So, it is likely aliens have minds like ours with different physical brains
-
- O1: (2) is wild
- O2: (1) is false
- Reactions are adaptive advantages, not psychological states
- A2: AI
- O1: appeal to the future
- O2: Chinese room
- A3: brain plasticity
- O1: different types of regions in the brain--this isn't possible for the mind
- A4: conceivable
- S1: Robots
- S2: gaseous creatures
- S3: brain prosthetics
- O1: not fine grained enough
- R1: implausible that the brain will match up perfectly like that
- A1: biology
Leave a Reply